ECMO has moved from a handful of academic centers to a capability that community and regional hospitals now feel pressure to offer. The clinical case is compelling; the operational reality is unforgiving. An ECMO program stood up without governance does not fail loudly — it drifts, quietly accumulating variation and risk until an outcome, a cost overrun, or a survey finding forces a reckoning.
ECMO is a program, not a device
The mistake is treating ECMO as an equipment purchase. The consoles are the smallest part. A functioning program is a system: round-the-clock coverage models, credentialed and competency-verified staff, standardized cannulation and management protocols, patient-selection criteria, transport and transfer agreements, and a quality process aligned to the ELSO registry. Buying pumps without building that system is how programs get into trouble.
What a maturity roadmap covers
The governance gap in multi-site systems
In a system with several hospitals, the risk compounds. One site may run a mature program while another launches its own with different equipment, different protocols, and no shared quality review. Patients who should be transferred are kept; patients who are kept are managed inconsistently. Enterprise ECMO governance exists so that a patient's care does not depend on which hospital's ICU they happened to land in.
Build it under oversight from day one
The cheapest time to govern an ECMO program is before it opens. A Perfusion Program Management Organization brings the governance structure, competency framework, and ELSO-aligned quality process to a new program from the start — and, for existing programs, provides the independent oversight that turns a collection of sites into a coherent, benchmarked service line.
Related insights
How is perfusion governed across your health system?
Request a briefing — an independent read of how your outsourced perfusion is overseen today, and where your exposure sits.